Iraq: compare and contrast, 3 years on

Consider that in three years Iraq has gone from enduring a brutal dictatorship to electing a provisional government to ratifying a new constitution written by Iraqis to electing a permanent government last December. In each of these elections, the number of voters participating has increased significantly — from 8.5 million in the January 2005 election to nearly 12 million in the December election — in defiance of terrorists’ threats and attacks.

from Donald Rumsfeld writing in the Washington Post.

2. The constitution drafted by the elected parliament enshrines Islam as the religion of state and stipulates that the civil parliament may pass no legislation that contravenes the established laws of Islam. It hints that clerics and ayatollahs will be appointed to court benches. The constitution has brought Iraq to the brink of being an Islamic Republic, with potentially harmful effects on the rights of women, gays, Christians and others. Since the Shiite religious parties had won the January 30, 2005 elections, this outcome was predictable.

5. All three Sunni Arab-majority provinces rejected the new constitution by a sound margin, two of them by a two-thirds majority. The Kurdish and Shiite provinces overwhelmingly approved the charter. Iraq thus has a permanent constitution that is absolutely unacceptable to the country’s most powerful minority.

from Juan Cole’s Top Ten Catastrophes of the Third Year of American Iraq

One of the most important developments over the past year has been the increasing participation of Iraq’s Sunni community in the political process. In the volatile Anbar province, where Sunnis are an overwhelming majority, voter turnout grew from 2 percent in January to 86 percent in December. Sunni sheiks and religious leaders who previously had been sympathetic to the insurgency are today meeting with coalition representatives, encouraging Iraqis to join the security forces and waging what violent extremists such as Abu al-Zarqawi and his al-Qaeda followers recognize as a “large-scale war” against them.

from Donald Rumsfeld writing in the Washington Post.

9. Widespread hopes, fanned by the Bush administration, that Sunni Arab participation in the parliamentary elections would lead to a reduction in guerrilla violence proved completely untrue. The various Sunni Arab lists garnered 58 seats of 275. The Sunni Arabs have now adopted a two-track strategy, working in parliament to play the Kurds and the Shiites off against one another while its paramilitary wing continued to blow things up with unrelenting ferocity.

from Juan Cole’s Top Ten Catastrophes of the Third Year of American Iraq

Meanwhile, the former Iraqi PM tells the BBC that Iraq is already in the middle of a civil war.

We are losing each day as an average 50 to 60 people throughout the country, if not more – if this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is – Iyad Allawi

What could be better than invading Iran, too?

No Responses to “Iraq: compare and contrast, 3 years on”

  1.   Pearce
    March 21st, 2006 | 3:13 pm

    Did you read about that guy in Afghanistan — the first country “liberated” after 9/11 — who was just thrown in jail for the heinous crime of converting to Christianity?

  2.   Administrator
    March 21st, 2006 | 4:53 pm

    Ah, no.

  3.   Pearce
    March 22nd, 2006 | 3:10 pm

    Here is some info about it. He’s facing the death penalty for converting to George Bush’s religion in a country that Bush’s administration made “safe”.

  4.   Administrator
    March 23rd, 2006 | 12:47 pm

    Interesting test case for Afghanistan as a “nation” under a “constitution”.